WebThe auditor should use the greater amount between the rollover method and iron curtain method in determining whether to propose an adjusting entry to correct material misstatement; The auditor has the option to use the amount under either the rollover method or iron curtain method in determining whether to propose an adjusting entry to … WebUnder the “dual-method” as required by SAB No. 108, management has determined that those misstatements are in the aggregate material as of the beginning of the year ended December 31, 2006 (i.e., January 1, 2006), and therefore their correction in the financial statements would be warranted.
corresp - SEC
WebThe auditor should check if the management has performed quantitative analysis in accordance with SAB 108. The quantitative analysis should consider the size of the error … WebFeb 1, 2009 · Rollover Versus Iron Curtain In SAB 108, these two approaches are called the "rollover" and "iron curtain." SAB 108 states: The rollover approach quantifies a … orbbec opencv
SEC.gov Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108
Webapproach. As both the ‘‘iron curtain” and “rollover’’ methods are commonly used in practice and the choice of method can significantly affect the auditors’ proposed adjustment decisions, we believe that the proposed standard should alert users of the issue and refer them to the guidance in SAB No. 108. WebStaff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 108 articulates guidance on applying the dual approach to evaluating uncorrected misstatements. Under the dual approach, a misstatement must be corrected if it is material (using guidelines established in SAB No. 99) under either the rollover method or the iron curtain method. WebAuditors generally use two methods for evaluating the materiality of misstatements or errors in the financial statements: the rollover, also known as the current-period or income-statement method, and the iron curtain, also known … ipmitool event log