WebJun 16, 2009 · The Porsche flat-six engine in the Boxster S retains its previous capacity of 3.4 litres, but now features direct fuel injection, complemented by numerous other changes. Power has been raised to 228 kW, 310 horsepower in sports car terms. Even more importantly, peak torque is an impressive 360 Nm. Though ‘peak’ is hardly the right word … WebOct 20, 2024 · All Boxsters that are 2005-2008 are 987.1. 987.2 are 2009-2012 cars. Smaller engines are also a giveaway. 2.5 or 2.7 equals 987.1, while 2.9 is 987.2. The 3.4 capacity …
Porsche Boxster Complete Engines for sale eBay
Web2 days ago · The 2004 Toyota MR2 and the 2004 Porsche Boxster are both highly sought-after sports cars in their own right, known for their sleek designs and powerful engines. However, regarding one key aspect, the Toyota MR2 reigns supreme. In this article, we will explore the details of how the 2004 Toyota MR2 outperforms the 2004 Porsche Boxster. … WebThe result is decreased emissions and increased fuel economy: the Boxster S using the PDK transmission can achieve more that 30mpg, an improvement of 16 per cent over the old … birch vanity tops
Complete Engines for Porsche Boxster for sale eBay
WebDec 9, 2011 · In fact, today’s 2.9-liter Boxster beats the 250 hp, 7200 rpm, 5.7 seconds, and 161 mph of the 3.2-liter 2000 Boxster S, which cost $50,695 new (roughly $66,500 in 2011 dollars). The Boxster’s considerable advances in comfort, safety, materials, and build … WebFeb 21, 2024 · It wasn't the pure fuel-economy play you might expect. The prior Boxster S actually beat this new one by a single mpg on the EPA highway cycle, with city and combined ratings unchanged. The 718 ... WebAvailable now is this impressive Porsche Macan, in stunning Blue with only 6,183 miles on the clock. This used Porsche Macan delivers impressive power with 380 BHP coupled with great acceleration going from 0-62 MPH in just 4.8 seconds, through the Porsche automatic gearbox.. This Macan is fitted with some fantastic features, including: Panoramic roof … birch v birch case summary