WebUNDP GUIDE. DRAFTING DATA PROTECTION. LEGISLATION: A Study of Regional Frameworks. 2 INTRODUCTION WebSep 16, 2024 · 51. Match the cases mentioned in List I with legal issues mentioned in List II and select the correct answer using the codes given below: List I. Tulasamma v. Sesha Reddy; John Vallmattom v. UOI; R. Kantha v. UOI; Sandhya v. UOI; List II. Right of a daughter to reopen the partition is valid
The Right to Privacy and Access to Abortion in a Post- Puttaswamy …
WebKEY FACTS: Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.), a retired judge of the Madras High Court, challenged the constitutional validity of the Aadhaar scheme. He argued that the scheme … WebAug 19, 2024 · Case study of popular cases with in depth analysis and opinion of various personalities. Recent Posts. Case Study: Ramji Lal Modi v. State of UP . Case Study: Banyan Tree ... is a now a fundamental right under Article 21 after the declaration made by the Supreme Court in this regard in the case of K.S Puttuswamy v. check scam account
Case Analysis ProBono India
WebFeb 3, 2024 · The HC held that such judgements have been overruled by Puttaswamy (to the extent that they do not recognise the right to privacy as a fundamental right). Furthermore, it was also held that these cases involved no examination of law on the touchstone of principles of proportionality and legitimacy, as laid down in Puttaswamy (¶ … WebNov 12, 2024 · The case has been brought by retired High Court judge K S Puttaswamy against the Union of India. According to his claim, Aadhar scheme violates article 14 [6] … WebFeb 2, 2024 · Another example is the dissenting opinion of Justice Subba Rao in the Kharak Singh v. State of U.P. (1962) case upholding the right to privacy which received the judicial stamp of approval in the K.S. Puttaswamy v. UOI (2024) case. ... Previous Post Previous EDITORIAL ANALYSIS : The growth deceleration problem cannot be skipped. check scamadviser